Tech SupportContact UsKUBTEC Scientific
Why 3d
Products
Department OverviewThe MOZART® SystemThe XPERT® SystemGammaPRO® System
About
Our WhyCareers
Events
News
Education
Blog
Case Studies
Clinical Data
On-Demand Webinars
Product Demos
PatientsSchedule Demo
Why 3d
Products
Department OverviewThe MOZART® SystemThe XPERT® SystemGammaPRO® System
About
Our WhyCareersEventsNews
Education
Blog
Case Studies
Clinical Data
On-Demand Webinars
Product Demos
PatientsContact UsTech Support

REFERENCES

  1. Kaczmarski K, Wang P, Gilmore R, et al. Surgeon re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery: a measure of low-value care. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 28(4): 504-512
  2. Natalia Partain, MD, et al. Differences in Re-excision Rates for Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Intraoperative 2D Versus 3D Tomosynthesis Specimen Radiograph. Ann Surg Oncol 2020: Published online Aug 01, 2020
  3. Ko Un Park, MD, et al. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019:26:1720-28.
  4. André Hennigs, MD, et al. Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery? Ann Surg Oncol Jun. 23, 2016
  5. Metcalfe, L N. et al. Beyond the Margins: Economic Costs and Complications Associated With Repeated Breast-Conserving Surgeries. JAMA Surg. Aug. 2, 2017.
  6. Fuzesi S et al. Satisfaction with Breast-Conserving Therapy After Re-excision: A Study Using the Breast-Q, A Patient Reported Outcomes Measure in Breast Surgery. SSO 2018
white kubtec logo
Stay informed – sign up to receive our updates
Sign Up
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Connect With Us
facebook logo
twitter logo
linkedin logo
111 Research Dr.
Stratford, CT 06615

203-364-8544

Made in the USA
American Flag
©2022 KUB Technologies
Privacy PolicyContact UsReferencesPatentsDistributor Portal